2014-07-01 7:26 GMT+02:00, John Crispin <j...@phrozen.org>: > NAK, xway is a unified kernel target and we wont change that upstream. > i am fine with the cpu override bit but i wont take the KConfig part, > > sorry, > John > > Why sorry? This is only a RFC. Kconfig part was only for "fine tuning", but, in addition to maintain XWAY as an unified target, those modifications can give problems now and in the future, and i don't want to make nobody's life harder. Regarding cpu override, ASE support was dropped some time ago so, what do you think about set cpu_has_mips16? Any additional advice for this file? Another question is if cpu_has_vint and cpu_has_veic can be enabled or simply dropped. I assume that a test will be the best to see if they are safe, am i right? In addition, in UGW CPU_MIPSR2_IRQ_VI is present in ASE, Danube, AR9, VR9 and AR10. Should be it set in Kconfig?
Off topic:i've tested MIPS_MT_SMP in a VR9 based router but, according top, 50% of the cpu time was busy with a kernel process; with MIPS_MT_SMTC the kernel freezes early when booting. A lot of thanks for your time and comments. Pepe _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
