26.06.2014, 06:03, "Daniel" <dan...@makrotopia.org>:

Hi Roman,

On 04/04/2014 04:39 PM, Roman Yeryomin wrote:

 I worked on other things lately but plan to return to rt2x00 soon and
 maybe try ralink driver on trunk again.

I started looking into your patches and started to see things moving as far as
you got.
I suggest to define RT6352 and set chip.rt to that instead of checking for
chip.rf == RF7620 in cases which were meant for RT5390.
Is there any more recent version of your work on rt2x00 than the
630-rt2x00-add-mt7620-20140131.patch included in your first post? If so, please
share it, I'd like to re-use what ever there is and try to botch things up a bit ;)

Cheers


Daniel

After some attempts tonight I make working version of the patch. But my trunk revision really very old and I need time to rebase it.
The key error was in rt2800_rfcsr_read for RF7620 (wrong bitmask). So
*value = rt2x00_get_field32(reg, RF_CSR_CFG_DATA);
instead of
*value = rt2x00_get_field32(reg, RF_CSR_CFG_DATA_MT7620);
broke all rf reading.
 
 
Good luck!
 
---
serge
 
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Reply via email to