On 14 February 2014 20:43, Mikko Hissa <mikko.hi...@werzek.com> wrote: > > On 14 Feb 2014, at 01:04, Roman Yeryomin <leroi.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 14 February 2014 00:34, Mikko Hissa <mikko.hi...@werzek.com> wrote: >>> In rt2800lib.c function rt2800_get_txwi_rxwi_size() >>> Add case MT7620 with RT5592. >>> >>> *txwi_size = TXWI_DESC_SIZE_5WORDS; >>> *rxwi_size = RXWI_DESC_SIZE_6WORDS; >>> break; >>> >> >> I suppose you mean RT5390 because: >> ieee80211 phy0: rt2x00_set_rt: Info - RT chipset 5390, rev 0500 detected >> >> Also as far as I understand (from datasheet) it's not the same as >> RT5592. Correct me if I'm wrong. >> So I added: >> >> case RT5390: >> *txwi_size = TXWI_DESC_SIZE_5WORDS; >> *rxwi_size = RXWI_DESC_SIZE_4WORDS; >> break; > > They should be 5 and 6 words not 5 and 4! > > *txwi_size = TXWI_DESC_SIZE_5WORDS; > *rxwi_size = RXWI_DESC_SIZE_6WORDS; > break;
You are right, it's 5 and 6 words - I misread the datasheet. Also seems there is a typo first stating txwi is 4 words but describing 5 below. Anyway I tried txwi 5 and rxwi 6 and results are the same. > The original driver detects MT7620 by chip id 0x5390 and bus type. The driver > in rt2x00 for RT5390 is for a another chip. So you might not want to run the > bits of code meant for RT5390 but create some dummy definition for MT7620 and > set it in rt2800_probe_rt(). > Ook.. I'll try to separate and clean that. Regards, Roman _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
