2013/4/2 Rafał Miłecki <zaj...@gmail.com>: > 2013/4/2 Nick Podolak <sur4...@gmail.com>: >> I have often found myself asking the same question. >> >> I use the x86 build target, which should be pretty easy to manage from a >> kernel perspective. Yet it's on 3.3 for attitude adjustment and 3.7 for >> trunk. Both of which are end of life. > > Please, don't top post. > > Using recent kernel for trunk makes sense, as we want to be as much up > to date as possible. Switching between n and n+1 kernel versions is > simple, only reduced amount of patches has to be rebased. Switching > directly from (for example) 2.6.32 to 3.4 would be really painful. > > We just should stop updating kernel (in a trunk) when there's a > OpenWrt release coming. As long as we can't release AA, it makes sense > to keep trunk updated to the latest releases.
(That is to explain 3.7 usage in trunk - at least for some targets. I don't say or think using 3.3 for AA was a good idea.) -- Rafał _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
