2013/2/21 Hauke Mehrtens <ha...@hauke-m.de>: > On 02/21/2013 07:46 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote: >> 2013/2/21 Hauke Mehrtens <ha...@hauke-m.de>: >>> On 02/19/2013 04:44 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote: >>>> There is b53 PHY driver for Broadcom switches some may want to use one >>>> bcm47xx platform. We still don't use b53 as default, but let's at least >>>> allow switching to it. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <zaj...@gmail.com> >>>> --- >>>> As alternative we could use @!PACKAGE_kmod-switch in DEPENDS, but sure >>>> if it makes difference to anyone? >>> >>> Could we wait with this patch till there is a switch driver that could >>> be configured by swconfig? @!PACKAGE_kmod-switch will not work because >>> for some time we probably need both packages when not all drivers are >>> converted. >> >> I believe there already is a proper driver: b53. Don't I understand >> something? >> >> It works fine for my BCM53125 switch. >> > Yes it works with the switches, but not with the ethernet drivers these > switches are connected to.
Hauke, Could you help me understanding that? ;) I'm not sure, what do we need to implement in b53 to start switching to it? I've compared b53 with rtl8367 and rtl8367b (just some random ones) and I can't see what can be missing in b53. -- Rafał _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
