> Am 09.01.2013 13:06, schrieb Aleksander Morgado: >> Oh, hey again André :-) >> Will that be much different to the 'qmi4g' protocol handler I wrote some >> time ago? See: >> https://gitorious.org/lanedo/openwrt-packages/blobs/qmi-support/net/qmi4g/files/qmi4g.sh >> > I reused parts of it and integrated it in a netifd protocol handler. My > modified version handels autodetection of device, setting pincode, apn, > username and password. At the moment I'm working on roaming preference > and mode preference. If these are ready, I'd call it almost complete. >
Cool. >> >> Ideally, I would really prefer to use ModemManager directly, in order to >> handle all vendor-specific s*** that MM already handles. > > That looks like a good idea, but isn't it a bit blown for an embedded > device? That's my fear. > Really depends on which embedded device, of course. I've already seen quite some embedded devices running a Linux-based distribution and relying heavily on ModemManager for vendor-agnostic mobile broadband modem support. I'm sure that if OpenWRT supported it by default there would be lots of people using it. -- Aleksander _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
