> I wanted to use such "DEPENDS" type instead of "define (...)/config" block > but unfortunately after converting "Kconfig selects" to equivalent "openwrt > DEPENDS:", eg: > > DEPENDS:=+@!PACKAGE_swap-utils:BUSYBOX_CONFIG_MKSWAP > +@!PACKAGE_swap-utils:BUSYBOX_CONFIG_SWAPONOFF > > I got this in opkg control file: > > Package: kmod-zram > Version: 3.6.11-1 > Depends: kernel (=3.6.11-1-479d5850a6a04abbd6713ee6c4ef65ac), kmod-lib-lzo, > kmod-zsmalloc, BUSYBOX_CONFIG_MKSWAP, BUSYBOX_CONFIG_SWAPONOFF, > > This doesn't look good, does it? So I tried to reverse this dependency to > allow people using buildroot to have the possibility to optimize their > builds and be able to select busybox applets instead of swap-utils package, > and also leaving other people using prebuild images the possibility to > install this kmod package through opkg with appropriate dependencies. > > Unfortunately with this: > > DEPENDS:=+@!BUSYBOX_CONFIG_MKSWAP:PACKAGE_swap-utils > +@!BUSYBOX_CONFIG_SWAPONOFF:PACKAGE_swap-utils > > I got this in opkg control file: > > Package: kmod-zram > Version: 3.6.11-1 > Depends: kernel (=3.6.11-1-479d5850a6a04abbd6713ee6c4ef65ac), kmod-lib-lzo, > kmod-zsmalloc, PACKAGE_swap-utils, PACKAGE_swap-utils > > Which still doesn't look good. > > @devs: Is there any chance for patch to opkg system so it generates proper > "Depends:" in such situations? I mean "swap-utils" instead of " > PACKAGE_swap-utils" This would be useful I think. What do you think?
That's easy: DEPENDS:=+!BUSYBOX_CONFIG_MKSWAP:swap-utils the @ is only needed if you want to select a symbol. I have never watched into a opkg control file, otherwise I would have seen that busybox depends will not work. For compiling you own image it's fine. _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
