-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi.
> But then it should be changed to is_rt2800(), right? Correct, I overlooked the inverted logic. > Sounds good, there's plan to add this into the AA? I was personally > thinking about such a generalization myself. No, it will most definitely not land in AA, also I want to wait for Felix to return so that he can comment on the matter. > I see this patch as an immediate fix for AA. I don't know, if it's > ok to introduce such a generalization into the AA. It's up to you > guys, I'll try to help as much as I can. Thanks. Sure, the help is appreciated. Regards, Jow -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlCzx2EACgkQdputYINPTPNCKACdFlpuD0cjhIsnwBQ5spVaEiku IPEAnj7CaarC1iwjuVqGW9imNMdb7YBj =cMR3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
