On 08/04/2012 11:53 PM, Tobias Diedrich wrote: > With 2012-07-16 ath5k seems stuck at txpower 0. > Possible fix: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1243981/, but > doesn't apply against 2012-07-16 since there were some changes to > phy.c between these. The patch has the wrong file prefix replace --- old/phy.c 2012-07-26 20:40:00.869150187 +0300 +++ new/phy.c 2012-07-26 20:43:25.074710577 +0300 with --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/phy.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/phy.c
> The latest release I can find on http://linuxwireless.org seems to > be 2012-07-03, are their automatic builds broken? > Same for http://www.orbit-lab.org/kernel/compat-wireless/2012/07/ They are only published if they build successful on all kernel versions since 2.6.24 and the last version where that happened was 2012-07-03, I already send patches to the mailing list to fix that, but Luis haven't applied them yet. > Where did the 2012-07-16 one come from? Felix created a version by himself. The version OpenWrt uses is also based on wireless-testing and not on linux-next like the version at http://linuxwireless.org. Hauke _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
