On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Dan VerWeire <dverwe...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Benjamin Henrion <b...@udev.org> wrote: >> "If Node A is behind a NAT device, you will have to forward port 7000." >> >> You still need a public ip address and access to your router, which is >> not available on most 3G connexions and not accessible for grandma. > > I am not sure what is meant by this. > > Must all packages be able to work without a public IP address, without > access to your router, over a 3G connection and be accessible for use > by technology-impaired users in order for it to be included in the > OpenWRT package repository? > > Or are you pointing out a downside of PeerVPN specifically?
Just pointing out to the downside of PeerVPN, which smells like tinc rebranded. But useful to have a package anyway. -- Benjamin Henrion <bhenrion at ffii.org> FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-3500762 "In July 2005, after several failed attempts to legalise software patents in Europe, the patent establishment changed its strategy. Instead of explicitly seeking to sanction the patentability of software, they are now seeking to create a central European patent court, which would establish and enforce patentability rules in their favor, without any possibility of correction by competing courts or democratically elected legislators." _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
