> No, it does not yet, but it may not look for them yet either - after > all there is nothing in the code for Picos until now.
It is supposed to find them, even if there is no entry in the hardware table - so something is broken on this particular model. Would it be possible for you to seen me a copy of the boardconfig partition? (Lookup the mtd index in /proc/mtd and dump it with dd if=/dev/mtdblockX of=/tmp/boardconfig.bin) > There is also no specific image for the Pico M created - just for > Nano M, Rocket M and Bullet M. There is also no image for the Loco M > created, although it would be worthwhile, as it has a different > maximum power (23dBm) compared to the Nano M (28dBm), and it has only > one Ethernet jack (eth0),as opposed to the Nano M, which has two > (eth0 and eth1 work), but for the Nano M the default configuration in > OpenWrt does not even define eth1 from the start. Something that > could be fixed? It is probably worth fixing but outside of the scope here. ~ Jow _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
