On 02/07/11 20:15, Luca Olivetti wrote:
> Al 02/07/11 19:58, En/na Florian Fainelli ha escrit:
>
>
>>> 0) @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
>>> +--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/eeprom_def.c 2011-02-08
>>> 17:33:42.000000000 +0100 ++++
>>> b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/eeprom_def.c 2011-02-20
>>> 17:51:47.000000000 +0100 +@@ -147,7 +152,7 @@
>>> + return false;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> +- if (!ath9k_hw_use_flash(ah)) {
>>> ++ if (1) {
>>>
>> This looks wrong.
>>
> Why?
>
> See http://patchwork.openwrt.org/patch/849/ for the previous discussion.
>
> Bye
>
because it will break devices which dont have the eeprom inside the flash
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
