Al 02/07/11 19:58, En/na Florian Fainelli ha escrit:
>> 0) @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
>> +--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/eeprom_def.c 2011-02-08
>> 17:33:42.000000000 +0100 ++++
>> b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/eeprom_def.c 2011-02-20
>> 17:51:47.000000000 +0100 +@@ -147,7 +152,7 @@
>> + return false;
>> + }
>> +
>> +- if (!ath9k_hw_use_flash(ah)) {
>> ++ if (1) {
>
> This looks wrong.
Why?
See http://patchwork.openwrt.org/patch/849/ for the previous discussion.
Bye
--
Luca
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
