On 04/12/2011 12:02 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > W dniu 11 kwietnia 2011 00:32 użytkownik Jonas Gorski > <jonas.gorski+open...@gmail.com> napisał: >> 2011/4/10 Rafał Miłecki <zaj...@gmail.com>: >>> Versioning of firmware is a little tricky, because version of included >>> firmware does not match version of driver. This way there is not such >>> think as firmware 4.150.10.5. If you want to be strict about that, you >>> can apply my following naming suggestions. >> >> I've thought about it; the driver version is probably the one that's >> visible and easily found; the included firmware version not so much. >> Also b43-fwcutter and everyone else is using using the driver >> versions, so suddenly switching to the firmware versions will probably >> just unnecessarily confuse people. >> >> I'll rename the config symbols and work the firmware version into the >> description/help text, so that it contains both without (hopefully) >> causing too much confusion. > > Hm, yes, you're right. I was not sure about names like "B43_FW_4_150". > Such a name suggests firmware (FW) version 4.150. However using > B43_FW_410_2160_FROM_4_150_10_5 on the other hand sounds crappy ;) > > Maybe B43_FW_FROM_4_150? I guess there is not perfect solution. > Hi,
nice patches Jonas. I would leave the names of the config options as you suggested so B43_FW_4_150, B43_FW_4_178 and B43_FW_5_10, but the config title should be extended, this should contain "Firmware 410.2160 from driver 4......" with the exact version numbers. The experimental and stable should be removed, but B43_FW_4_150 should be the default one. Hauke _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
