2011.03.29. 18:44 keltezéssel, Layne Edwards írta: > On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 17:30:21 +0200, Jochen Friedrich <joc...@scram.de> wrote: >>> IMHO, it doesn't matter how patches are submitted - whether it be via >>> mailing >>> list or trac - as long as the same method is used for all patches so they >>> are >>> all in the same place (and therefore don't slip through the cracks). As for >>> patchwork, I see that some patches submitted via the mailing list are not >>> listed... so if that is the only source the devs use to accept patches, some >>> might be missed. >> >> Only unprocessed patches are listed by default. You have to clear the >> filter to see all patches and their status. >> > > Clearing all filters, I still don't see all patches in patchwork. For > example, > the following are not listed: > > 3/21 - Add WLAN LED support for Ralink RT305x SoC Devices > 3/15 - sysupgrade and status LED support for ramips HW550-3G
Correct, your patches are not there. Probably because each line of the message body contains a leading whitespace, and they were not identified as valid patches. -Gabor _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
