I am not sure how much difference there is between devices, as there is for example no image for the pico. I just took a bullet M image and flushed the pico M and lo, it works just fine. And they all have 8MB flash memory now, so they are pretty comparable these days. So maybe the loco works witht he nano m image? I suggest you give it a go - with the tftp reset mode these devices are almost impossible to brick.
On 14 February 2011 20:45, Daniel A. Nagy <nagyd...@epointsystem.org> wrote: > Hello, > > I got a bit confused with the state of OpenWrt support of Ubiquiti > NanoStation Loco M5. I guess, it might not be firmware-compatible with > NanoStation M5, as firmware images such as > openwrt-ar71xx-ubnt-nano-m-squashfs-factory.bin > do not work with it. Neither from the binary OpenWrt distribution, nor > if I build it from backfire sources myself. > > The factory firmware is based on OpenWrt Kamikaze, but they seem to be > using only the cross-compiling toolchain; most of OpenWrt goodness (uci, > opkg, etc.) appear to be out of the window. > > I am willing to do the work of porting OpenWrt to this remarkable device > if necessary, but before I start reinventing and reimplementing the > wheel, I would like to ask what the current status of OpenWrt support > for this particular device is and who, if anyone, is working on it? > > Regards, > > -- > Daniel A. Nagy > > > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-devel mailing list > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel > >
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
