On 22.11.2010 09:35, Stefan Tomanek wrote: > Dies schrieb Matthias Buecher / Germany (m...@maddes.net): > >> So if you are sure that the patch is not mangled by your mail client (no >> wraps, no tabs to spaces), then inline is definitely preferred. >> Maybe setting some options in your mail client will avoid this behaviour. > > Can you point me to the line where any mangling took place? I just checked > the list reply of my own message, which looks completely fine to me, but > when checking your reply, I noticed some tabs being replaced by spaces inside > the quoted patch. > > I don't think mutt does any mangling, since the message itself is generated > by "git format-patch" and sent as it is.
Hadn't a look at your patch, maybe also his mail client mangles the mail when only displayed. I'm using Thunderbird 3.1 and my current settings mangle the mail when I reply. As far as I know your setup shouldn't mangle the patch. Can someone confirm? (Note to myself: finally try to setup TB correctly) _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
