On Sat, 1 Aug 2009 05:03:22 -0400 Daniel Dickinson <crazycsh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Doesn't mklibs.py remove portions of a library that are unused? > Wouldn't that mean that fewer programs would result in more removal > (due to more unused bits). Or do you strip all libraries and not > just uClibc? > Never mind. I see that you are stripping all libraries. So yes, good idea. I was confused by your specifically mentioning the uClibc loader. Can you give comparative squashfs sizes instead? Also, this may takes signficantly long periods of time for large numbers of packages. Have you tested with more than the base setup? Regards, Daniel -- And that's my crabbing done for the day. Got it out of the way early, now I have the rest of the afternoon to sniff fragrant tea-roses or strangle cute bunnies or something. -- Michael Devore GnuPG Key Fingerprint 86 F5 81 A5 D4 2E 1F 1C http://gnupg.org The C Shore (Daniel Dickinson's Website) http://www.bmts.com/~cshore
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
