Hi Daniel, Le Saturday 01 August 2009 11:03:22 Daniel Dickinson, vous avez écrit : > On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 12:25:20 +0200 > > Florian Fainelli <flor...@openwrt.org> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Please find below a proof-of-concept of the mklibs.py reduction > > integration in OpenWrt. I have not been able to strip the uClibc > > loader more than 4KB out of 28KB (original size) but it might > > significantly better results with more softare installed in the > > rootfs. --- Index: Config.in > > Doesn't mklibs.py remove portions of a library that are unused?
It does indeed. > Wouldn't that mean that fewer programs would result in more removal > (due to more unused bits). Or do you strip all libraries and not just > uClibc? I think I did not ask it to strip down all shared libraries, thus it only stripped down the linker. I will try to look at it later in the weekend. -- Best regards, Florian Fainelli Email: flor...@openwrt.org Web: http://openwrt.org IRC: [florian] on irc.freenode.net -------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
