On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 20:16 +0100, Michael Buesch wrote: > On Tuesday 03 February 2009 05:44:42 Brian J. Murrell wrote: > > The bad news is that throughput still sucks rocks.
Sorry if that sounded harsh. It didn't seem as harsh when I was writing it as it did just now reading it. I meant no ill-will in any way by it. Just trying to be frank I guess. I'm not known for beating around the bush. :-) > This is unlikely to change ever, except if broadcom releases the sources. OK. That's fair enough. I was just trying to supply some feedback in case it was in fact unexpected. I thought full throughput was being targeted by the current reverse engineering effort. I can totally understand if it will never be achieved. > Go and buy a device that's actually vendor supported, if you want full > throughput. Yeah. Given that it's got a minipci slot in it, maybe an atheros or something. I did in fact buy an ipw2200 based card "on spec" hoping to replace the broadcom card in that unit but alas, the AP support for that card is next-to-nonexistent. Fortunately I didn't pay too much for it and I had a laptop here with an old broadcomm 802.11b card in it that I replaced. Cheers, b.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org http://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
