On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 20:59 +0700, OutBackDingo wrote: > Its funny you all speak about division, being i cant completely > functionally use any of them that exists, being x-wrt, gargoyle, or luci
That's exactly my point. _Exactly_. Here we have 3 or 4 (or more) web UIs all going off in different directions and not one of them functional enough that I don't need a shell prompt. Don't get me wrong, I applaud all of the time and effort being put into development of FOSS, I just think that the OpenWRT WebUI effort would be better serviced by some collaboration of resources to yield one or two UIs that were functionally useful for the varied uses and functions that OpenWRT can be put to. I'm all for a simple and advanced UI, but those don't have to be different projects. The same framework (i.e. the meat behind the eye-candy) can be used to provide both rather than two completely different frameworks with two completely different lipstick-and-mascara covers on them. b.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org http://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
