Hi, On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 08:10:39PM +0200, Samuli Seppänen wrote: > >> the wrong arch (32b) did *not* function as expected. > >> (or did .. depending on how you look at it) > > This is interesting. I probably have to test this myself and see how it > goes. I have not actively tested 32-bit executables on 64-bit Windows, > yet there have been no complaints as far as I can remember. So they tend > to just work.
Last time I tested on Win7/64, the 32 bit executables worked just fine
(this is how I noticed that installing 64 bit onto a system that already
has a 32 bit version installed causes two versions to be there...)
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025 g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Openvpn-users mailing list Openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users
