Hi, On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Erich Titl <erich.t...@think.ch> wrote:
> Hi Folks > > sorry to chime in late (and unsolicited) > You are welcome. > > Am 21.10.2015 um 22:48 schrieb Gert Doering: > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 04:37:57PM -0400, Selva Nair wrote: > >> If I'm not mistaken, persist-remote-ip pre-dates connection-list > support. > >> With multiple options conditionally depending on each other, such > seemingly > >> unexpected behaviour is no surprise.. Call it feature or a bug. The user > >> asked for persist-remote-ip which the manual says will persist both IP > and > >> port, so why expect something else. > > > > If the documentation says so, it's not a bug. Just a weird feature, > which > > we might want to eventually print a warning about... > > If I recall my network programming in days long ago a net address was > composed of IP _and_ port. Maybe this was the original authors idea. > Sure, not having "port" in the option name may be confusing but that is clarified in the manpage. The implications of it are less obvious to a casual user. Programming wise, as you say something like a struct sockaddr_in is what is persisted. Cheers, Selva
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Openvpn-users mailing list Openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users
