On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 5:11 PM, <debbie...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >>> >> Why? Because of this line in the config: >>> >> >>> >> persist-remote-ip >>> >>> >> That will keep trying X:1194 only with whatever protocol is defined >>> >> before >>> >> those lines (or udp by default), if persist-remote-ip is also >> >>> specified. >>> >> This is an unfortunate side-effect of that option. >>> >>> > Ouch. >>> >>> > Could you re-test whether this is still true with git master, please? >>> >>> I think we may have a problem Houston: >>> >> >> >> If I'm not mistaken, persist-remote-ip pre-dates connection-list support. >> With multiple options conditionally depending on each other, such >> seemingly >> unexpected behaviour is no surprise.. Call it feature or a bug. The user >> asked for persist-remote-ip which the manual says will persist both IP and >> port, so why expect something else. >> >> > > Gert asked for a specific test, which I tested. > I had no *expectations*
Easy, that was meant as legalistic remark for an arbitrary user of the universe.. Nothing personal. In fact if it applies to anyone it should be the OP who's problem we all were trying to solve.. And, happy to see your test results agrees with mine.. Selva
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Openvpn-users mailing list Openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users
