Hi, On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 09:29:22AM +0200, Antonio Quartulli wrote: > Wouldn't it be better to have one patch of reach default behaviour being > charged with a concise but focused explanation as to why that default is > being changed? > > After those patches, then another patch could come in implementing > compat-mode.
NAK to the proposed approach, because that would give us incompatible
(and unfixable-incompatible) versions in between.
I am open to splitting this patch, but would turn it around
- compat-mode comes *first*, with an option that basically "does nothing"
- each change to a default setting brings in the required compat-mode
adjustments
but I can live with "all in a single commit", provided the commit message
(+ Changes.rst) is clear enough on the "what and why".
gert
--
"If was one thing all people took for granted, was conviction that if you
feed honest figures into a computer, honest figures come out. Never doubted
it myself till I met a computer with a sense of humor."
Robert A. Heinlein, The Moon is a Harsh Mistress
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Openvpn-devel mailing list Openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel
