Am 26.08.20 um 03:15 schrieb Eric Thorpe: > Hi Arne, > > I'm happy to resubmit the patch with further documentation to what I > have already included with this patch, however I need to know what is > likely to be accepted. > > Per my previous question and example, is it acceptable to keep using > CR_TEXT and document the C and CR flags, or, as I think you have hinted, > would you prefer I create a fourth INFOPRE spec, for example CR_DATA, > and document that instead?
Maybe. I am not against the idea of allowing more authentication methods. But I am not sure what you are trying to achieve. > It would also be highly appreciated if I could get some indication if > this patch is acceptable outside of the requirement for further > documentation or if the code needs further changes. Currently I don't understand what authentication method you are trying to implement. It is frustrating for me that you avoid that question. For accepting it is very simple. Either is something everyone using OpenVPN can implement and understand and you are willing to share with OpenVPN. Then the patches can go. If it a special private authentication method and you don't want to share that, then your patches can also be kept private and applied your own branch/client/server. Arne
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Openvpn-devel mailing list Openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel
