Hi,

On 22/06/18 17:46, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 03:27:02PM +0800, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
>> Fri Jun 22 13:43:51 2018 us=116232 PUSH: Received control message: 
>> 'PUSH_REPLY,redirect-gateway !ipv4 ipv6,tun-ipv6,ping 10,ping-restart 
>> 120,ifconfig-ipv6 2002::1001/112 2002::2,peer-id 0,cipher AES-256-GCM'
> 
> As an afterthought - the error could be totally unrelated to the changes,
> and the win32 API refusing 2002:: addresses because it knows that they
> are not "free for grabs"...  (6to4, normally auto-configured unless
> disabled, with 2002:<ipv4>:: being the prefix that a host on <ipv4> or
> a network behind a router on <ipv4> can use - but that's old stuff and
> should no longer be used in any case).

After changing the prefix to 2001:db8:cafe::/112 the error is gone.

However, the assert at the end of the log in argv.c:299 is still there.
This might be some argv_new()/reset() that has been misplaced (maybe?).

Cheers,


-- 
Antonio Quartulli

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Openvpn-devel mailing list
Openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel

Reply via email to