Hi Jon, > What system are you using to generate MSIs? Marc (CC'd) has a patch for WIX > that adds support for generating ARM64 MSIs.
I am using a WiX to make two separate MSI files (x86 and x64). This is the easy part - I had the WiX MSI package ready back at Hackatlon in an hour or so. However, those MSI files do not create a TAP interface on install -- which is a regression. The TAP interface will be created on install using a custom action (DLL). I want to support MSI custom action deferred/commit/rollback functionality in full. An additional EXE command line utility will be included in the install to allow later TAP interface management completely replacing the tapinstall.exe/devcon.exe. > Are you wrapping two arch-specific MSIs in an EXE, or doing one mixed MSI? > Two MSIs will be very simple to add ARM64 to, while one mixed MSI will be > harder. I see no drawbacks compiling the custom action DLL and EXE command line utility for ARM64 platform and providing a third MSI file for ARM64 platform as you suggest. This is the best way to go in my opinion too. Finally, the plan is to offer TAP driver binaries for download as separate platform-specific MSI files (for IT admins) and a simple self-extractable x86 EXE containing all the MSI files and a "detect-platform-and-launch-appropriate-MSI" bootstrapper (for end-users). For this EXE bundle WiX, 7-Zip or some other easy to implement and maintain framework is to be used. > As for tapinstall, a standalone tapinstall under VS2017 will work perfectly > with > what I'm building since the EWDK consumes the vcxproj and sln files directly. The new MSI custom action and EXE utility I am working on it are built using vcxproj. If we get a green light to port the driver building itself to a vcxproj as well, the TAP driver build environment could move from Python to VS2017. However, while we can potentially renew the TAP driver build process (being Windows-only), we are limited with options when packaging OpenVPN for Windows. For OpenVPN Windows packaging, the requirement to prepare MSI files within the Linux environment remains. After a discussion msitools package was chosen for the job. Yes, I must kick myself and start working on this seriously!? Best regards, Simon ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Openvpn-devel mailing list Openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel