Hi,

On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 02:54:03PM +0200, David Sommerseth wrote:
> Gert proposed by a mistake to use uint8_t.  As integers are most
> commonly 32 bits, so uint32_t.  But that may be of a different length on
> some other platforms.  So using 'unsigned int' is most likely the safest
> type in this round.  Or if wanting to be really portability safe, have a
> look at what Simon pointed out, inttypes.h.

"unsigned int" is indeed perfectly correct for "%x"

I was not paying enough attention (and this is why I call for extra
care when doing "just a simple patch to fix a compiler warning", because
more complicated patches usually get more attention...)

Apologies for the noise I caused.  Actually the *first* patch in the
series might have been perfectly fine - need to check ;-)

gert


-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             g...@greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Openvpn-devel mailing list
Openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel

Reply via email to