On 20-03-17 19:28, Gert Doering wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 07:20:50PM +0100, Steffan Karger wrote:
>>> @@ -589,9 +589,7 @@ socket_defined(const socket_descriptor_t sd)
>>>  /*
>>>   * Should we include OCC (options consistency check) code?
>>>   */
>>> -#ifndef ENABLE_SMALL
>>>  #define ENABLE_OCC
>>> -#endif
>>>  
>>>  /*
>>>   * Should we include NTLM proxy functionality
>>>
>>
>> If we unconditionally enable OCC, should we not just rip out #ifdef
>> ENABLE_OCC everywhere?
> 
> We certainly could, but someone who still wants "no OCC! smaaall!" 
> still has the option to turn it off...
> 
> We might revisit that, though - there's "the option checking code",
> which indeed brings in quite a bit of code that might be considered
> optional, but there is also stuff in sig.c that makes --explicit-exit-notify
> depend on ENABLE_OCC, and I'd consider that as something quite 
> important...

Ok, let's revisit that later.  This patch doesn't hurt if we decide to
rip out more later, and would be good to get into 2.4.1, so ACK.

-Steffan

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Openvpn-devel mailing list
Openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel

Reply via email to