Hi, On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 07:20:50PM +0100, Steffan Karger wrote: > > @@ -589,9 +589,7 @@ socket_defined(const socket_descriptor_t sd) > > /* > > * Should we include OCC (options consistency check) code? > > */ > > -#ifndef ENABLE_SMALL > > #define ENABLE_OCC > > -#endif > > > > /* > > * Should we include NTLM proxy functionality > > > > If we unconditionally enable OCC, should we not just rip out #ifdef > ENABLE_OCC everywhere?
We certainly could, but someone who still wants "no OCC! smaaall!"
still has the option to turn it off...
We might revisit that, though - there's "the option checking code",
which indeed brings in quite a bit of code that might be considered
optional, but there is also stuff in sig.c that makes --explicit-exit-notify
depend on ENABLE_OCC, and I'd consider that as something quite
important...
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025 g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________ Openvpn-devel mailing list Openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel
