On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 4:45 AM, Samuli Seppänen <sam...@openvpn.net> wrote:

> Il 05/07/2016 10:02, Samuli Seppänen ha scritto:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 7:33 AM, Samuli Seppänen <sam...@openvpn.net
>>> <mailto:sam...@openvpn.net>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     Here is an installer that includes all the necessary bits to make
>>>     openvpnserv2/interactive service things work nicely:
>>>
>>>     <
>>> http://build.openvpn.net/downloads/snapshots/openvpn-install-2.3_git-I905-x86_64.exe
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> Tested this installer on windows 7. Works as expected with two minor
>>> issues:
>>>
>>> (i) If service installation checkbox is unselected, interactive service
>>> remain selected and obviously fails in the end as no service binaries
>>> get installed
>>>
>>
>> Ah yes, I see what you mean. I'll create a dependency between these two
>> selections.
>>
>> (ii) If GUI is running, the installer offers to stop it but in that case
>>> it also offers to restart it at the end of installation. That's not good
>>> as it gets started as admin (as installer runs as admin) which is not
>>> ideal -- at least not what I wanted. I would say just do not offer to
>>> start the GUI at all even if it was stopped by the installer -- let the
>>> user restart it after installation.
>>>
>>
>> Agreed.
>>
>>
> Hi,
>
> Fixed the issues you identified:
>
> <https://github.com/OpenVPN/openvpn-build/pull/23>
> <
> http://build.openvpn.net/downloads/snapshots/openvpn-install-2.3_git-I907-x86_64.exe
> >
>
> Based on brief testing everything now seems to work correctly. If the user
> deselects SecService, then SecInteractiveService is deselected
> automatically.
>
> Right now, when SecService is not selected, clicking on the
> SecInteractiveService checkbox does not do anything. This would be nice to
> fix, but it is also in line with what we have now. Plus fixing it might not
> be as trivial as adding yet another ${If} to the .onSelChange function.


The changes look good.

One unrelated thing is that that the README file (INSTALL-win32.txt?) shown
at the end of the installation is somewhat outdated -- it had comments
about the need to start as admin on vista+ etc..

Selva

Reply via email to