it is almost the same choice like whether to include "run as admin" manifest or leave it to user. from security point of view, it makes sense that running anything with admin privileges might be security issue and user should agree on that.
but I vote for starting interactive service from installer with no question asked )) 2016-06-29 15:07 GMT+05:00 Samuli Seppänen <sam...@openvpn.net>: > "Enable and start interactive service during installation" is on my todo. > I think we can safely enable it, because it will not automatically go out > starting any VPNs. > > Samuli > > I had a look at installers (as we enroll our own installer). >> I've got more questions regarding installers >> >> for example, interactive service is installed, but not started. So, user >> without admin rights cannot just start it. >> it would be better to either start it from installer or add checkbox >> there "start service" >> >> 2016-06-29 14:11 GMT+05:00 Samuli Seppänen <sam...@openvpn.net >> <mailto:sam...@openvpn.net>>: >> >> >> Hi, >> >> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 01:57:14PM +0500, ???????? >> ?????????????? wrote: >> >> ok, if so, we need to modify installer to detect that. >> >> >> Right, "master" installers should refuse cooperation on XP. >> >> Samuli, you're listening? ;-) >> >> gert >> >> >> Yes. Do we still want to bloat "master" installers with tap-windows? >> >> Afaics that would only be useful _if_ somebody is having problems >> with tap-windows6 and needs to revert to tap-windows. However, in >> that case we'd need checkbox, not automatic tap-driver selection >> based on the OS. >> >> Samuli >> >> >> > >
