Am 28.11.15 um 18:25 schrieb Selva Nair: > Hi, > > On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 10:08 AM, ValdikSS <i...@valdikss.org.ru > <mailto:i...@valdikss.org.ru>> wrote: > > Hi! > > You have the point, note is confusing on XP. Changed it to "…on > Windows Vista or later". > > > That doesn't make it any less confusing. If I run a generic 2.3 (i.e no > wfp) build on on windows 7. I'll get that warning even though I am on > "vista or later". So it has to be something like "..not supported in > this build" or whatever... We can't anticipate on what version of > windows a build without wfp compiled-in may be run.. > > > > Non-fatal note message is intended to have one config file on > various platforms without any modifications. > > > There is already a way to handle that. So why break it for someone who > doesn't want to ignore unknown options? In my view a better way is to > let the existing code in options.c handle it appropriately (as fatal or > warn depending on other options, whether its being pushed or read from > config etc..)
I am also voting on fatal error if the option is unknown. You can always use setenv opt block-outside-dns or use ignore-unknown-option if you do not want it to fail. Arne
