-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 24.08.2015 20:18, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi, > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:04:25AM +0200, Jiri Horky wrote: >>
continuing yesterday's IRC discussion. I would like to ask whether you
>> can think of a reason why TUN_MTU_MIN is set to only 100 bytes, and
>> maybe more importantly, why this value is effectively enforced in
function > > I'm not sure if you've been following the list and/or git
master > commits, but we have somehing in master for a while now... > >
commit fc91d4b0071178e298052078431fb86f03be84fc (master) > > Author:
Steffan Karger > Date:   Tue Jun 30 21:44:56 2015 +0200 > >     
Increase control channel packet size for faster handshakes > >     
Signed-off-by: Steffan Karger <[email protected]> >      Acked-by: Gert
Doering <[email protected]> >      Message-Id:
<[email protected]> >      URL:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.network.openvpn.devel/9841 >     
Signed-off-by: Gert Doering <[email protected]> > > > ... and as far
as we can see, this "just works" (and OpenVPN 3 on iOS > and Android
also uses larger packets for the control channel, so we're > just
following suit here). >
OpenVPN Android also uses this patch (and Gert's faster connect patch)
for two weeks now and bad reports about the new version (apart from a
lot of broken config with extra arguments ... :( )

Arne
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)

iEYEARECAAYFAlXbhfkACgkQe8+cMNS4zRcDgQCgqWq2swsrCjleyNDV/5pAJFpx
x5IAoM9j/ZH1Tbu3BC4GvlFbUkZU85Yn
=IRXC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to