Hi, On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:04:25AM +0200, Jiri Horky wrote: > continuing yesterday's IRC discussion. I would like to ask whether you > can think of a reason why TUN_MTU_MIN is set to only 100 bytes, and > maybe more importantly, why this value is effectively enforced in function
I'm not sure if you've been following the list and/or git master commits, but we have somehing in master for a while now... commit fc91d4b0071178e298052078431fb86f03be84fc (master) Author: Steffan Karger List-Post: [email protected] Date: Tue Jun 30 21:44:56 2015 +0200 Increase control channel packet size for faster handshakes Signed-off-by: Steffan Karger <[email protected]> Acked-by: Gert Doering <[email protected]> Message-Id: <[email protected]> URL: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.network.openvpn.devel/9841 Signed-off-by: Gert Doering <[email protected]> ... and as far as we can see, this "just works" (and OpenVPN 3 on iOS and Android also uses larger packets for the control channel, so we're just following suit here). So, if you run git master, you already have it :-) - and if you run 2.3.x, you can just cherry-pick the patch, it should apply easily. (It will eventually hit 2.3.9 or 2.3.10, but I want to wait for a bit more feedback from the "early testers") gert -- USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! //www.muc.de/~gert/ Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [email protected] fax: +49-89-35655025 [email protected]
pgpg2yyO_5hpb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
