Hi,

On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 12:09:47PM +0200, Arne Schwabe wrote:
> Yes but changing AAAA/A of opnvpn.company.com or IN SRV of
> openvpn.company.com is not such a big difference.

This was my thought as well, but SRV does have merits - especially
the priority thing is something you can't properly do with "traditional"
DNS entries (if you have multiple A/AAAA records, you just get load
sharing).

It's not a killer feature, as "most of it" could be achieved by having

remote openvpn-pri1.company.com
remote openvpn-pri2.company.com
remote openvpn-pri3.company.com

in your configs, and DNS/GeoDNS can steer this to the proper hosts - 
but SRV makes it more convenient to the user (and much work for the 
implementor... :) )

So - I wouldn't *implement* this myself, but if it were there, I'd
propably *use* it.  Example: I have rolled out quite a number of 
.ovpn client profiles that prefer TCP before UDP today.  Given the
nice new tls-float feature, I'd actually love to have them try UDP
first...  without rolling out new .ovpns...

gert
-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             g...@greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de

Attachment: pgpF_QTsDOFCa.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to