Hi, On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 05:08:12PM +0200, Arne Schwabe wrote: > > SRV record mechanism/requirements are the following: > > - It's protocol-specific, so at lookup time it has to be known whether > > it's for UDP or TCP > If proto were optional that would fit OpenVPN better. But SRV records > seem not support that.
Well, one could just do two lookups, one for _tcp and one for _udp,
and use that to fill pseudo-<remote>-entries, not only with port info
but also with protocol info..
But it's not totally trivial.
[..]
> And if you modify anything use -master and not 2.3 as starting point.
> The code in question has changed a lot between releases (dual stack
> client patches).
Yes, what Arne said. And this will not go into 2.3 as it will be too
much of a change to be added into a release fairly late in its maintenance
cycle... so "master it is".
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025 g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
pgpfrNI65qmEH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
