Am 14.02.13 11:52, schrieb David Sommerseth:
> Hi,
>
> This is just a minor issue which has been annoying me a little bit.
> I've attached a patch which ensures that the --tls-remote semantic
> warning is only printed once.
>
> However, I wonder how useful that warning really is these days.  Do
> we really need that warning?  The warning comes from this commit [1]:
>
> commit c04bc0223c9b17f203555b933cbeedbf3b343c0e
> Author: james <james@e7ae566f-a301-0410-adde-c780ea21d3b5>
> Date:   Sun Jul 27 18:20:52 2008 +0000
>
>     Added additional warnings for:
>     
>     * --tls-remote -- some people misunderstand the semantics
>     
>     * --script-security -- warn if script-security will allow user-defined
>       scripts to be called, and also warn separately if passwords may be
>       passed to scripts via the environment
>     
> It's from 2008.  I see that in some cases this warning is needed, but I
> also think people need to read the man pages when things doesn't work as
> expected.  Not that we need to hand-hold people the whole way through.
>
> If we find that all of these warnings are not that useful any more, I'd
> rather suggest that we revert the commit above.  Otherwise we can also
> consider to just remove the --tls-remote warning completely.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
>
I think we can remove the script-security warnings completely. I never
found the --tls-remote useful either.

Arne

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to