On 14/11/12 10:03, Adriaan de Jong wrote:
> [PATCH] Fix --show-pkcs11-ids (Bug #239)
> 
> Broken by 75b49e406430299b187964744f82e50a9035a0d3.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joachim Schipper <joachim.schip...@fox-it.com>
> ---
>  src/openvpn/pkcs11.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Hi Joachim,

Thanks a lot for you fix!  Just a little question.  You mention this
commit as being the offending commit:

commit 75b49e406430299b187964744f82e50a9035a0d3
Author: Alon Bar-Lev <alon.bar...@gmail.com>
List-Post: openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Date:   Sun Apr 1 16:46:28 2012 +0300

    cleanup: gc usage

    Cleanup of "Use the garbage collector when retrieving x509 fields"
    patch series.

    Discussed at [1].

    There should be an effort to produce common function prologue
    and epilogue, so that cleanups will be done at single point.

    [1] http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.openvpn.devel/5401

    Signed-off-by: Alon Bar-Lev <alon.bar...@gmail.com>
    Acked-by: Adriaan de Jong <dej...@fox-it.com>
    Signed-off-by: David Sommerseth <dav...@redhat.com>


I'm just wondering how this could be related to you fix.  As I see it,
the syntax of the if() statement you change didn't change, neither the
behaviour of pkcs11_certificate_dn().

I see that commit 00b973f8af85c3ea8fa3cef80eec55e8dc139b27 changes the
behaviour of pkcs11_certificate_dn() in both the OpenSSL and PolarSSL
implementation.  So I'm suspecting you referenced the wrong commit.  Right?


-- 
kind regards,

David Sommerseth

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to