On 12/03/2011, Joe Patterson wrote: > I'm all for adding flexibility, but this really seems like a > solution to a problem for which there's hardly ever *not* a better > work-around.
As I just mentioned in an answer to Peter, listening on 0.0.0.0
doesn't work reliably on my setup, please refer to that e-mail for
the full explanation.
Of course, if you do have a better workaround that will work in this
setup, I'll be glad to hear about it!
Fede
