On Thu, 23 Jun 2005, Simon Perreault wrote: > On Thursday 23 June 2005 12:05, James Yonan wrote: > > One concern I would have is whether the PAM version test at build time is > > always predictive of what the PAM version will be at run time. > > No, but then that would be going into the realm of cross-compiling.
I was thinking more about someone who builds a binary RPM on a machine that has a correctly linked pam-modules set causing autoconf to sense this -- now that RPM can't be used on a machine with an earlier broken version of pam-modules. James
