On Wednesday 22 June 2005 14:59, Simon Perreault wrote: > I've also rebuilt the RPM (on a FC4 system, because I > deleted my SUSE 9.1 vmware) and my rebuilt RPM does not have the bug!
AH! I understand now! Even though pam_unix.so is *built* in the pam RPM, it is not *included* in the RPM. The real pam_unix.so comes from pam-modules and this one doesn't link against PAM. That's a bug that should be reported to SUSE.
