Thanks! any specific version of TripleO i should use or openstack version for production?
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 11:54 AM, Fawaz Mohammed <fawaz.moh.ibrah...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, you can do that. > > On Feb 1, 2018 8:49 PM, "Satish Patel" <satish....@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Is it ok if i create undercloud on VMware because its easier to take >> snapshot and clone etc. >> >> ~S >> >> On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 11:38 AM, Fawaz Mohammed >> <fawaz.moh.ibrah...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > In case your undercloud is dead, there will no be any impact in your >> > overcloud, but you will not be able to perform day 2 operations on your >> > tripleO environment, such as scale-out / scale-in the infrastructure, >> > update >> > / upgrade your overcloud. >> > For that, it's recommended to backup the undercloud at least after each >> > operation in it. >> > >> > --- >> > Regards, >> > Fawaz Mohammed >> > >> > >> > On Feb 1, 2018 8:23 PM, "Satish Patel" <satish....@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > You have a point there! Got it, >> > >> > One more question what will happened if deploy my cloud and second day >> > my undercloud (TripleO) node is dead? is it going to impact my >> > overcloud production? because all recipe cooked inside undercloud and >> > now its no more. >> > >> > Do you think i need to keep backup of undercloud? >> > >> > On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 11:21 AM, Fawaz Mohammed >> > <fawaz.moh.ibrah...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On TripleO deployment, it's a challenge to use VMs for any overclode >> >> role >> >> (controller, compute or storage). As undercloud uses BMC / IPMI to >> >> control >> >> the power if bare metal during the deployment. >> >> >> >> --- >> >> Regards, >> >> Fawaz Mohammed >> >> >> >> >> >> On Feb 1, 2018 8:07 PM, "Satish Patel" <satish....@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> Thanks for info i will keep in mind, Can we use VM for controller >> >> node? or 1 physical and 2 VM controller node, just a thought >> >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 10:45 AM, Fawaz Mohammed >> >> <fawaz.moh.ibrah...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> For TripleO deployment, you'll need: >> >>> A separate node or VM as UnderCloud. >> >>> 3 control nodes for HA, 2 controllers can't form HA by default, this >> >>> is >> >>> to >> >>> avoid split-brain scenarios. >> >>> For compute nodes, I recommend to have 2 x 10G ports, one for O&M and >> >>> the >> >>> other one for tenants. And a separate 1G for BMC / IPMI. >> >>> >> >>> --- >> >>> Regards, >> >>> Fawaz Mohammed >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 7:32 PM, Satish Patel <satish....@gmail.com> >> >>> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> We are CentOS7 shop that is why i have started playing with TripleO >> >>>> on >> >>>> my VMware environment to get familiar. what do you suggest for 20 >> >>>> node >> >>>> cluster? we don't have any storage requirement all we need CPU and >> >>>> Memory to run our application, currently all application running on >> >>>> VMware and i want to migrate them over Openstack and do some rapid >> >>>> deployment. >> >>>> >> >>>> This is what i am planning (let me if i am wrong) >> >>>> >> >>>> 2 controller node (in HA) >> >>>> 2 Cisco ASR1k (L3 function in HA) >> >>>> 20 compute node with 10G nic and lots of memory and many cpu cores. >> >>>> >> >>>> Anything else which i am missing? >> >>>> >> >>>> On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 10:15 AM, Fawaz Mohammed >> >>>> <fawaz.moh.ibrah...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>> > Hi Satish, >> >>>> > >> >>>> > TripleO (Supported on CentOS and RHEL) and Juju (Supported on >> >>>> > Ubuntu) >> >>>> > [1] >> >>>> > are the most used OpenStack deployment tools. >> >>>> > >> >>>> > From the deployment perspectives, you need to know your cloud setup >> >>>> > and >> >>>> > the >> >>>> > required plugins to decide which deployment you will choose. As >> >>>> > each >> >>>> > tool >> >>>> > has a pre-integrated plugging out of the box. >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > [1] >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > https://docs.openstack.org/charm-deployment-guide/latest/install-juju.html >> >>>> > --- >> >>>> > Regards, >> >>>> > Fawaz Mohammed >> >>>> > >> >>>> > On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 5:04 PM, Satish Patel <satish....@gmail.com> >> >>>> > wrote: >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> Hi Fawaz, >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> Great so you think I'm doing right thing to use ASR1k for my L3 >> >>>> >> function? >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> I'm using DVR on my lab with 3 node cluster and it's kinda >> >>>> >> complicated >> >>>> >> to >> >>>> >> troubleshoot sometime. >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> We are planning to build 20 node cluster for start and started >> >>>> >> playing >> >>>> >> with tripleo to deploy and having lots of issue with tripleo too >> >>>> >> :( >> >>>> >> I >> >>>> >> was >> >>>> >> also thinking to use mirantis but they stopped development. >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> Based on your experience what most of folks use to deploy middle >> >>>> >> size >> >>>> >> cloud? What about you? >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> On Jan 31, 2018, at 11:48 PM, Fawaz Mohammed >> >>>> >> <fawaz.moh.ibrah...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> http://www.jimmdenton.com/networking-cisco-asr-install/ can beet >> >>>> >> your >> >>>> >> requirements. I have another plugin in production from different >> >>>> >> vendor >> >>>> >> for >> >>>> >> the same purpose. and it works perfect. >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> Regarding your question about the license, usually, there is no >> >>>> >> license >> >>>> >> for such plugins. >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> I've no production experience with DVR, and I don't recommend it >> >>>> >> in >> >>>> >> medium >> >>>> >> to large environment. >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 2:58 AM, Satish Patel >> >>>> >> <satish....@gmail.com> >> >>>> >> wrote: >> >>>> >>> >> >>>> >>> What about this? >> >>>> >>> http://www.jimmdenton.com/networking-cisco-asr-part-two/ >> >>>> >>> >> >>>> >>> ML2 does use ASR too, >> >>>> >>> >> >>>> >>> Just curious what people mostly use in production? are they use >> >>>> >>> DVR >> >>>> >>> or >> >>>> >>> some kind of hardware for L3? >> >>>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >>>> >>> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 4:02 PM, Fawaz Mohammed >> >>>> >>> <fawaz.moh.ibrah...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>> >>> > Hi Santish, >> >>>> >>> > >> >>>> >>> > In my knowlege, Cisco has ml2 driver for Nexus only. >> >>>> >>> > >> >>>> >>> > So, if you have requirements for dynamic L3 provisioning / >> >>>> >>> > configuration, >> >>>> >>> > it's better to go with SDN solution. >> >>>> >>> > >> >>>> >>> > On Jan 31, 2018 11:39 PM, "Satish Patel" <satish....@gmail.com> >> >>>> >>> > wrote: >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> So no one using ASR 1001 for Openstack? >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 11:21 PM, Satish Patel >> >>>> >>> >> <satish....@gmail.com> >> >>>> >>> >> wrote: >> >>>> >>> >> > Folks, >> >>>> >>> >> > >> >>>> >>> >> > We are planning to deploy production style private cloud and >> >>>> >>> >> > gathering >> >>>> >>> >> > information about what we should use and why and i came >> >>>> >>> >> > across >> >>>> >>> >> > with >> >>>> >>> >> > couple of document related network node criticality and >> >>>> >>> >> > performance >> >>>> >>> >> > issue and many folks suggesting following >> >>>> >>> >> > >> >>>> >>> >> > 1. DVR (it seem complicated after reading, also need lots of >> >>>> >>> >> > public >> >>>> >>> >> > IP) >> >>>> >>> >> > 2. Use ASR1k centralized router to use for L3 function (any >> >>>> >>> >> > idea >> >>>> >>> >> > what >> >>>> >>> >> > model should be good? or do we need any licensing to >> >>>> >>> >> > integrate >> >>>> >>> >> > with >> >>>> >>> >> > openstack?) >> >>>> >>> >> > >> >>>> >>> >> > Would like to get some input from folks who already using >> >>>> >>> >> > openstack >> >>>> >>> >> > in >> >>>> >>> >> > production and would like to know what kind of deployment >> >>>> >>> >> > they >> >>>> >>> >> > pick >> >>>> >>> >> > for network/neutron performance? >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> >>>> >>> >> Mailing list: >> >>>> >>> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack >> >>>> >>> >> Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org >> >>>> >>> >> Unsubscribe : >> >>>> >>> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> > >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > _______________________________________________ Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
