Yes, you can do that. On Feb 1, 2018 8:49 PM, "Satish Patel" <satish....@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is it ok if i create undercloud on VMware because its easier to take > snapshot and clone etc. > > ~S > > On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 11:38 AM, Fawaz Mohammed > <fawaz.moh.ibrah...@gmail.com> wrote: > > In case your undercloud is dead, there will no be any impact in your > > overcloud, but you will not be able to perform day 2 operations on your > > tripleO environment, such as scale-out / scale-in the infrastructure, > update > > / upgrade your overcloud. > > For that, it's recommended to backup the undercloud at least after each > > operation in it. > > > > --- > > Regards, > > Fawaz Mohammed > > > > > > On Feb 1, 2018 8:23 PM, "Satish Patel" <satish....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > You have a point there! Got it, > > > > One more question what will happened if deploy my cloud and second day > > my undercloud (TripleO) node is dead? is it going to impact my > > overcloud production? because all recipe cooked inside undercloud and > > now its no more. > > > > Do you think i need to keep backup of undercloud? > > > > On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 11:21 AM, Fawaz Mohammed > > <fawaz.moh.ibrah...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On TripleO deployment, it's a challenge to use VMs for any overclode > role > >> (controller, compute or storage). As undercloud uses BMC / IPMI to > control > >> the power if bare metal during the deployment. > >> > >> --- > >> Regards, > >> Fawaz Mohammed > >> > >> > >> On Feb 1, 2018 8:07 PM, "Satish Patel" <satish....@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> Thanks for info i will keep in mind, Can we use VM for controller > >> node? or 1 physical and 2 VM controller node, just a thought > >> > >> On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 10:45 AM, Fawaz Mohammed > >> <fawaz.moh.ibrah...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> For TripleO deployment, you'll need: > >>> A separate node or VM as UnderCloud. > >>> 3 control nodes for HA, 2 controllers can't form HA by default, this is > >>> to > >>> avoid split-brain scenarios. > >>> For compute nodes, I recommend to have 2 x 10G ports, one for O&M and > the > >>> other one for tenants. And a separate 1G for BMC / IPMI. > >>> > >>> --- > >>> Regards, > >>> Fawaz Mohammed > >>> > >>> > >>> On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 7:32 PM, Satish Patel <satish....@gmail.com> > >>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> We are CentOS7 shop that is why i have started playing with TripleO on > >>>> my VMware environment to get familiar. what do you suggest for 20 node > >>>> cluster? we don't have any storage requirement all we need CPU and > >>>> Memory to run our application, currently all application running on > >>>> VMware and i want to migrate them over Openstack and do some rapid > >>>> deployment. > >>>> > >>>> This is what i am planning (let me if i am wrong) > >>>> > >>>> 2 controller node (in HA) > >>>> 2 Cisco ASR1k (L3 function in HA) > >>>> 20 compute node with 10G nic and lots of memory and many cpu cores. > >>>> > >>>> Anything else which i am missing? > >>>> > >>>> On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 10:15 AM, Fawaz Mohammed > >>>> <fawaz.moh.ibrah...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> > Hi Satish, > >>>> > > >>>> > TripleO (Supported on CentOS and RHEL) and Juju (Supported on > Ubuntu) > >>>> > [1] > >>>> > are the most used OpenStack deployment tools. > >>>> > > >>>> > From the deployment perspectives, you need to know your cloud setup > >>>> > and > >>>> > the > >>>> > required plugins to decide which deployment you will choose. As each > >>>> > tool > >>>> > has a pre-integrated plugging out of the box. > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > [1] > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > https://docs.openstack.org/charm-deployment-guide/latest/ > install-juju.html > >>>> > --- > >>>> > Regards, > >>>> > Fawaz Mohammed > >>>> > > >>>> > On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 5:04 PM, Satish Patel <satish....@gmail.com> > >>>> > wrote: > >>>> >> > >>>> >> Hi Fawaz, > >>>> >> > >>>> >> Great so you think I'm doing right thing to use ASR1k for my L3 > >>>> >> function? > >>>> >> > >>>> >> I'm using DVR on my lab with 3 node cluster and it's kinda > >>>> >> complicated > >>>> >> to > >>>> >> troubleshoot sometime. > >>>> >> > >>>> >> We are planning to build 20 node cluster for start and started > >>>> >> playing > >>>> >> with tripleo to deploy and having lots of issue with tripleo too :( > >>>> >> I > >>>> >> was > >>>> >> also thinking to use mirantis but they stopped development. > >>>> >> > >>>> >> Based on your experience what most of folks use to deploy middle > size > >>>> >> cloud? What about you? > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> Sent from my iPhone > >>>> >> > >>>> >> On Jan 31, 2018, at 11:48 PM, Fawaz Mohammed > >>>> >> <fawaz.moh.ibrah...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> >> > >>>> >> http://www.jimmdenton.com/networking-cisco-asr-install/ can beet > your > >>>> >> requirements. I have another plugin in production from different > >>>> >> vendor > >>>> >> for > >>>> >> the same purpose. and it works perfect. > >>>> >> > >>>> >> Regarding your question about the license, usually, there is no > >>>> >> license > >>>> >> for such plugins. > >>>> >> > >>>> >> I've no production experience with DVR, and I don't recommend it in > >>>> >> medium > >>>> >> to large environment. > >>>> >> > >>>> >> On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 2:58 AM, Satish Patel <satish....@gmail.com > > > >>>> >> wrote: > >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> What about this? > >>>> >>> http://www.jimmdenton.com/networking-cisco-asr-part-two/ > >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> ML2 does use ASR too, > >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> Just curious what people mostly use in production? are they use > DVR > >>>> >>> or > >>>> >>> some kind of hardware for L3? > >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 4:02 PM, Fawaz Mohammed > >>>> >>> <fawaz.moh.ibrah...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> >>> > Hi Santish, > >>>> >>> > > >>>> >>> > In my knowlege, Cisco has ml2 driver for Nexus only. > >>>> >>> > > >>>> >>> > So, if you have requirements for dynamic L3 provisioning / > >>>> >>> > configuration, > >>>> >>> > it's better to go with SDN solution. > >>>> >>> > > >>>> >>> > On Jan 31, 2018 11:39 PM, "Satish Patel" <satish....@gmail.com> > >>>> >>> > wrote: > >>>> >>> >> > >>>> >>> >> So no one using ASR 1001 for Openstack? > >>>> >>> >> > >>>> >>> >> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 11:21 PM, Satish Patel > >>>> >>> >> <satish....@gmail.com> > >>>> >>> >> wrote: > >>>> >>> >> > Folks, > >>>> >>> >> > > >>>> >>> >> > We are planning to deploy production style private cloud and > >>>> >>> >> > gathering > >>>> >>> >> > information about what we should use and why and i came > across > >>>> >>> >> > with > >>>> >>> >> > couple of document related network node criticality and > >>>> >>> >> > performance > >>>> >>> >> > issue and many folks suggesting following > >>>> >>> >> > > >>>> >>> >> > 1. DVR (it seem complicated after reading, also need lots of > >>>> >>> >> > public > >>>> >>> >> > IP) > >>>> >>> >> > 2. Use ASR1k centralized router to use for L3 function (any > >>>> >>> >> > idea > >>>> >>> >> > what > >>>> >>> >> > model should be good? or do we need any licensing to > integrate > >>>> >>> >> > with > >>>> >>> >> > openstack?) > >>>> >>> >> > > >>>> >>> >> > Would like to get some input from folks who already using > >>>> >>> >> > openstack > >>>> >>> >> > in > >>>> >>> >> > production and would like to know what kind of deployment > they > >>>> >>> >> > pick > >>>> >>> >> > for network/neutron performance? > >>>> >>> >> > >>>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ > >>>> >>> >> Mailing list: > >>>> >>> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack > >>>> >>> >> Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org > >>>> >>> >> Unsubscribe : > >>>> >>> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> > > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
