+1 from me as well. 2015년 7월 10일 (금) 18:27, Neil Jerram <neil.jer...@metaswitch.com>님이 작성:
> On 10/07/15 10:19, Thierry Carrez wrote: > > > > Part of the confusion here is that we are not naming "releases". We are > > naming release *cycles*. We are giving a name to a period of time, > > basically. In that period of time, various version numbers for various > > components will be released. Saying "Glance 12.0.0 was released in > > OpenStack 13 cycle" is not really helping. > > > > We won't run out of letters, because the names can cycle back to A > > (potentially using a new theme, away from "geographic features near > > where the corresponding design summit happened"). > > > > So while we could technically name a release cycle "14", I feel it's a > > bit more difficult to rally around a number than a name. Also, numbers > > wouldn't really solve the perceived issues with names: numbers happen to > > also be culturally meaningful. You don't have a 13th floor in many US > > buildings. In China, building miss the 4th floor instead. 9 is feared in > > Japan. And don't talk about 39 to Afghans. > > > > I think "growing up" is accepting the pain that comes with picking a > > good name, rather than sidestepping the issue. > > +1 to all that. Nicely put. > > Neil > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-operators mailing list > openstack-operat...@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
