Isn't Mita a trademark of Kyocera they use for their copier business? Folks should read up on Musashi Miyamoto https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Musashi_Miyamoto if you want a name that resonates with our Japanese colleagues.
-- mark > On Jul 8, 2015, at 11:48 PM, Somanchi Trinath > <trinath.soman...@freescale.com> wrote: > > My Vote to "Mita" . :) > > -----Original Message----- > From: Monty Taylor [mailto:mord...@inaugust.com] > Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 8:10 PM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); Openstack > Users > Subject: [openstack-dev] Rescinding the M name decision > > Hi everyone! > > In light of issues raised concerning the initially selected name for the M > release (Meiji), that name will not be used. > > It turns out fully open community and fully inclusive collaboration is a hard > thing to get right. On the one hand, we do not want to exclude anyone's input > or contribution. On the other hand, we do not want the result of that > openness to result in effective exclusion or seeming persecution of a > minority group. > > We tried very hard with this naming election to ensure that everyone was able > to participate in nominations, and that everyone was able to participate in > elections without the sense that someone had arbitrarily limited anyone > else's contribution unduly. > > There are ways in which this was successful and ways in which is was not. > Clearly the cultural and historical connotations of this choice are an area > where the democratic process did not serve us, and I expect us to circle back > and do work to figure out how to do better in our next iteration. > > The foundation team is doing legal due diligence on the next set of names in > the list below (#4-6) and we expect to have an update within a week. If > anyone has concerns about any of these potential choices, please raise them > now. > > 1. Mita (三田) (Condorcet winner: wins contests with all other choices) 2. > Minato (港) loses to Mita (三田) by 954–913 3. Meiji (明治) loses to Mita (三田) > by 1034–873, loses to Minato (港) > by 1052–879 > 4. Mitaka (三鷹) loses to Mita (三田) by 1094–702, loses to Meiji (明 > 治) by 1012–870 > 5. Musashi (武蔵) loses to Mita (三田) by 1093–829, loses to Mitaka (三 > 鷹) by 971–892 > 6. Meguro (目黒) loses to Mita (三田) by 1137–690, loses to Musashi (武 > 蔵) by 958–872 > 7. Minami (みなみ) loses to Mita (三田) by 1183–621, loses to Meguro > (目黒) by 858–857 > 8. Mejiro (目白) loses to Mita (三田) by 1294–485, loses to Minami (み > なみ) by 990–658 > 9. Mizuho (瑞穂) loses to Mita (三田) by 1338–421, loses to Mejiro (目 > 白) by 905–625 > 10. Musashino (武蔵野) loses to Mita (三田) by 1472–305, loses to Mizuho (瑞穂) by > 1034–456 11. Marunouchi (丸の内) loses to Mita (三田) by 1505–275, loses to > Musashino (武蔵野) by 931–481 > > Monty > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack > Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org > Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack _______________________________________________ Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
