Chuck Short wrote: > On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Michael Still <mi...@stillhq.com > <mailto:mi...@stillhq.com>> wrote: > >> So, a few questions... >> >> - If there are no users shall we remove it from Havana and Grizzly as >> well, or does that violate our stability principles too much? > > > Speaking with my stable maintainers hat on I would personally NACK this > since > it doesnt meet the standard of a stable maintenance requirement, imho.
It definitely doesn't meet our stable maintenance rules. We want people to be able to safely upgrade to the latest stable/* when they are users of the release. We don't add new features, removing them would be even worse. >> - If we don't remove the code from stable, what about removing all >> references from the stable docs and putting in a warning saying that >> powervm is a dead end instead? I want to minimise confusion on the >> part of people deploying stable releases. > > This would be okay in my opinion. At the very minimum I would add the "dead-end" comment to the Havana release notes. If Anne is fine by it, it could also be added to the stable/havana version of the docs. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) _______________________________________________ Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
