On Mon, 2013-11-18 at 07:40 +0000, Radcliffe, Mark wrote: > We need to distinguish between (1) adding the modules to the "Core > OpenStack Project" which requires a recommendation by the TC and > approval by the Board and (2) adding the modules to an integrated > release (including Core OpenStack Project) which uses the OpenStack > brand.
We already clearly make this distinction. That was the primary conclusion of the Incubation Update Committee: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Foundation/IncubationUpdate2013 > We don't yet have approval for adding these modules to the Core > OpenStack Project (Hypothetical 1). However, adding the modules to an > integrated release (including Core OpenStack Project) using the > OpenStack brand is permitted (Hypothetical 2). However, the use of a > term "Orchestration" with the OpenStack mark, such as OpenStack > Orchestration needs Board approval. Yes, that's the TC's reasoning behind recommending to the board that Heat and Ceilometer be added to the "Core OpenStack Project". And the TC sees a big distinction between this meaning of "Core OpenStack Project" and "the set of functionality/APIs/code which must be included in products licensed to use the OpenStack brand". The latter meaning of "core" is not defined in or covered by the bylaws AFAICT. Mark. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
