Hi Mark, On Thu, 2013-11-14 at 07:58 -0600, m...@openstack.org wrote: > Yes. > > Also, there are two trademark concepts being mixed here. > > 1) > *Can* the projects themselves use the word "OpenStack" such as > "OpenStack Orchestration"? > Answer: yes absolutely. This is already a done deal and we are already > doing it in practice. And its covered under the bylaws once they are > included in the integrated release by TC vote. There is no need for > further action.
That's not our understanding. See the parts of the bylaws quoted here: https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/governance/tree/resolutions/20131106-ceilometer-and-heat-official-names I think it's pretty clear that unless a 'module' (e.g. Heat) is added to the 'Core OpenStack Project' by the board on the recommendation of the TC, it can't call itself e.g. OpenStack Orchestration. Mark. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
